UN Millennium Declaration and globalization

Several months ago I posted an analysis of the UN Millennium Declaration (UNMD). One of the things I mentioned was the stated goal of the UNMD, to promote globalization in a positive light and to ensure that everyone benefits equally from it. I went on to provide a very brief definition of “globalization”, just enough to serve my purposes at the time. Nevertheless, it’s clear that globalization is a very complex concept that requires more attention (probably even more than I may ever have the opportunity to devote to the subject). What I would like to do now is to present a brief overview of my current understanding of the concept based on recent literature. This is certainly not the only definition of globalization, but I believe it is one of very few ways of defining it in a manner that is consistent with the goals of the UNMD. (Note: references are incomplete. I’ll fix this in the next couple of days.)
Click below to read on…

Continue reading

Posted in Development, Education, ICTs | Leave a comment

Global Alliance for ICT and Development

The inaugural meeting of the newly established Global Alliance for ICT and Development (GAID) starts next week, June 19th. This is certainly an interesting development and I’m anxious to see what comes out of the meeting. I think that the multi-sectoral approach could prove to be very beneficial.
The selection of Intel’s Craig Barrett as chairman I think is an excellent choice. Not only is he extremely qualified for the task, but he also seems to be genuinely dedicated to addressing the problems faced by developing countries today in an equitable and meaningful manner.

Posted in Development, ICTs, Information Society, Leapfrogging development | Leave a comment

Chinese blog tops popularity list

Things have been slow around here. I’m in the midst of a relocation from the US to my home in Iceland and though Iceland is supposedly a leader in terms of connectivity, it takes 2 weeks (!!!) to get my home Internet connection going (still waiting…).
Anyway, who else thinks it remarkable that the most popular blog according to technorati.com is a a chinese blog? (Haven’t a clue what it’s about, but I find it remarkable nonetheless. Here’s the blog.)

Posted in ICTs, Information Society, Internet | Leave a comment

African’s pay on average 90 times more than Americans for Internet

This is just very, very sad: CNN.com – Official: Africans pay $1,800 for 1GB of data – May 18, 2006.

Posted in Development, ICTs, Information Society, Internet, Leapfrogging development | Leave a comment

Q&A with $100 laptop Negroponte

Just in case you’re still missing something regarding the $100 laptop: RED HERRING | Q&A: Nicholas Negroponte

Posted in Development, Education, ICTs, Leapfrogging development | Leave a comment

New Global Alliance for Information Technologies and Development

There was a fair amount of disappointment with the outcomes of the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). As far as the two primary issues that were expected to be addressed by the summit, internet governance and the Digital Solidarity Fund, are concerned, nothing really happened. But, since the summit ended there have been some things trickling down the pipeline – some more interesting than others. The newest announcement related to the WSIS is the launch of the GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND DEVELOPMENT. The announcement for this alliance is actually quite interesting for several reasons. First of all it emphasizes that the Millenium Development Goals (MDGs) will not be achieved unless ICTs are effectively integrated into development activities across the board. This may not seem new – the MDGs do mention ICTs and the need for ICTs in development efforts. But, this announcement goes further in stating that the success of development efforts depends on the integration of ICTs. Secondly is the makeup of the alliance. It is meant to be a “multi-stakeholder” collaboration that goes far beyond the traditional make-up of groups working on development in that it should include non- and under-represented groups and that these groups are intended to collaborate.
It will certainly be interesting to see what comes out of this.

Posted in Development, ICTs | Leave a comment