Is it possible to leapfrog backwards?

Outrageous, if you ask me: CNN.com – Tolls could dot the Internet highway – Feb 27, 2006

Posted in ICTs, Information Society, Internet, Leapfrogging development | Leave a comment

Stats galore

I just discovered this. Lots of useful statistical info, all available at one place: NationMaster.com – Where Stats Come Alive!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Leapfrogging with wireless networking

These are the types of things I like. An “open source-like” book titled Wireless Networking in the Developing World. The book is authored by known and respected professionals. It is released under a ShareAlike Creative Commons license. The book is available for free electronically or a printed copy can be ordered. It is supported by the website, where the authors have set up a wiki for commenting on the book, making corrections, translating and providing concrete examples of projects. Impressive stuff. Check it out.

Posted in Development, ICTs, Information Society, Internet, Leapfrogging development | Leave a comment

Leapfrogging into the information society

Sometimes I feel that I need to refocus and put the things I’ve posted about into context. This blog is supposed to be about leapfrogging, but it might not always be clear where I’m going with these ponderings of mine. So here’s a brief opinion piece to tie some things together. The burning question of the day – given what I’ve posted here, what is my view of leapfrogging development?
For me, this boils down to at least two questions:
– What are the goals of leapfrogging development?
– What is the role of ICTs in leapfrogging development, given those goals?
My answer to the first question is that the goal of leapfrogging development is the expansion of the information society to be representative of the multitude of ways of knowing throughout the world. This is not a technological development and it is not something that concerns only those who find themselves on the wrong side of the “digital divide”. To me, the notion of the information society is global, democratic and inclusive. Being a part of the information society is not only about having access to information, more important is being able to contribute to the information society. The focus for leapfrogging development is then on finding ways to increase the input of marginalised societies and cultures into the global information flow. As long as that input is missing, the information society is deficient. Hence, leapfrogging is intended to “fix” the information society by increasing the diversity of resources available.
The reason that ICTs are important for leapfrogging development has nothing to do with the technological sophisticiation expected of members of the information society. Rather, it just so happens that they are, at the moment, the best means we have for sharing information. If we were to discover tomorrow that we are all able to communicate globally through “extra-sensory perception”, a lot of that technology would be immediately rendered obsolete. The technology is not the necessary part of the equation. The necessary part of the equation is being able to translate knowledge into information in a way that it becomes meaningful for others and to have the means for effectively using and communicating that information.
Leapfrogging is to me not a matter of one party helping another. It is a collaborative activity that is intended to benefit everyone involved. What leapfrogging can provide for developing countries is acknowledgement of the relative cultural knowledge base in a global society – empowerment in a world driven by knowledge and information. For developed countries, recognition that there is no supremacy in knowledge – knowledge, wherever it originates, constitutes a valuable contribution to be evaluated on a par with any other knowledge. You never know where the “next big thing” is going to come from. Now, how do we effectively use ICTs to promote and support the activities necessary to form an equitable information society? And, how will we know if it is being achieved?
This is certainly not all I have to say on the matter, but let it suffice for the time being. And now for a couple of relevant links:
India is such an excellent example of what I’m talking about – India Empowered to me is Knowledge taking roots in the village
I think Wikipedia can be leveraged as an important tool in leapfrogging development – Blogs and Wikis: Ushering in an Era of Change

Posted in ICTs, Information Society, Leapfrogging development | Leave a comment

The information society in China

It’s funny how things happen to fall into your lap at just the right moment. Here I am pondering the nature of the information society, wondering what are the characteristics of an information society and when can we say that we have, or that someone has joined, an information society, when this story of internet use in China (more here, too) pops up. Basically, what happened is that a journalist in China, that does its best to control and filter Internet access, sent out a message about restrictions about to be imposed on a group of editors just prior to a meeting where these restrictions were to be announced. The message proliferated over the Internet so that, eventually, everyone knew what was about to happen before it was announced. The authorities ended up reversing their decision. The questions that arise in my mind are, can a country that tries to control access to the Internet be considered fully integrated with the information society (i.e. is the information society by necessity a democratic society)? And, can a domestic power ever fully control access to the Internet or are they just delaying the inevitable (i.e. integration into the democratic information society)?

Posted in ICTs, Information Society | Leave a comment

More on the “information society”

I’ve been thinking some more about the “information society”, something I’ve thought about in the past. I thank Ajit K. Pyati’s paper for re-piquing my interest because I think this is an important issue, since it is something that we seem to be striving for. I decided to put down some of my thoughts. This can be taken as an argument for the need for something more than the “technological determinism” identified by Pyati in the WSIS documents referred to in his paper. Click below to read my thoughts…

Continue reading

Posted in Development, Information Society | Leave a comment