What information skills for the 21st century?

Yesterday’s tragedy in Connecticut was a horrible event that no one should ever have to experience and I sincerely feel for the people of Newtown, CT. But, if ever there was an appropriate time to consider the impact of vastly increasing flows of information on society and what “21st century information skills” means, this is one.

In the aftermath of the tragedy, the media frenzy quickly turned into utter chaos. Everyone seemed to have a “reliable” (albeit anonymous) resource to back up their claims. Yet, stories changed every 15 minutes or less, accusations flew, Facebook and Twitter profiles of innocent people were splashed across TV screens and websites. Anyone with a name remotely like that of whomever was being named as the shooter at a given time and who had a Facebook or Twitter account was inundated with death threats, wishes for eternal damnation in the fires of Hell, and just downright deplorable comments that displayed the worst of the worst of human nature. When the story of what had actually transpired finally started to materialize late in the afternoon, it bore little resemblance to what had been reported throughout much of the day.

One of the key attributes that we have to consider when processing information is the authority with which the informant speaks. In the past, we have tended to regard formal news outlets as specialists in collecting information, validating it, and producing factual reports on that basis – tell what is known and no more. Those days are gone. Yesterday, news outlets appear to have anxiously blurted out anything and everything that they came across in the hopes that something would turn out to be the major scoop that brings in the ratings with total disregard for actual facts. It turns out that today’s news outlets have little more credibility than the forums on Fox Nation.

The loss of media credibility puts the onus of validating information on the “informed”. This is perhaps the most critical 21st century information skill looking into the near future. Sure, people still need to acquire the skills to find appropriate information to suit their needs and to produce quality information, but at this point, it’s urgent that people be equipped to properly evaluate and validate the information that will find them. Yesterday’s utterly meaningless info-chaos suggests that we’re not doing it right, yet.

Posted in Education, ICTs, Information Society, Technology foresight | Leave a comment

E-learning guy says that MOOCs are glorified books – No, I don’t think so.

Edit: Following a brief Twitter exchange with Dr. Cramer I want to note the following – The quote below is but a snippet of a 30 minute conversation and is probably missing a lot of context. Dr. Cramer has put out a call for proposals for MOOCs to explore their potential at the University of Minnesota.

MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) are all the rage these days. You can hardly turn a corner without running into some discussion about MOOCs. As the name suggests, MOOCs are online courses designed for self-directed study and made available to large numbers of learners. What’s more, the reigning view is that they are made available for no cost to the learner. MOOCs are being backed by some very high profile players in the higher education market in the US, ex. Stanford, MIT and Harvard. Others, however, are somewhat skeptical and cautious. For example, Dr. Christopher Cramer (self-proclaimed MOOC skeptic according to his Twitter profile), who was recently appointed “faculty liaison for e-learning initiatives” at the University of Minnesota, had this to say in this morning’s Star Tribune,

‘MOOCs have been around for a long time. They’re called books,’ said U chemistry Prof. Christopher Cramer. ‘The model removes an instructor from the equation … so what’s left is just content. It may be really well-designed content, if you’re willing to spend the money, but it’s just content.’

He doesn’t sound very optimistic about MOOCs, as far as I can tell. Continue reading

Posted in Education, ICTs, Knowledge development, Leapfrogging development, Technology foresight | Leave a comment

Newitz on futurism: A critique gone awry

Annalee Newitz posted an article on io9 a few days ago titled, “The Slow Future: The Future Is Not Accelerating”. Basically it’s a critique of the optimism regarding technological development that is expressed by some futurists. However, I find the criticism largely misguided and likely to propogate the myth and mysticism that tends to be associated with futurism among those who don’t fully understand what it is that futurists do and why they do it. Among the critical mistakes that Newitz makes are:

  1. She assumes that futurists foresee a future (i.e. some inevitability) as if they’ve discovered some hidden secret in their magical crystal balls.
  2. She generalizes from a very small group of futurists (she actually only refers to two) to futurism in general.
  3. She is stuck in a context of the present as regards both her criticism of futurism and her perception of what we have achieved with technology.
  4. She fails to recognize how the concept of “time” works in futurists’ discourse.

Continue reading

Posted in Leapfrogging development, Technology foresight | Leave a comment

Singapore moving toward future with artificial intelligence in schools

Authorities in Singapore have announced plans to start developing artificial intelligence (AI) tools for use in schools as part of their FutureSchools@Singapore project. The tools are intended to engage learners in evolving discussions on specific school subjects – in particular science and English literature, to begin with. Instructors will be able to access data collected through learners’ interactions with the AI tools to assess their learning needs. This is an interesting demonstration of how educators in Singapore are increasing their future-orientations.

Continue reading

Posted in Development, Education, ICTs, Information Society, Knowledge development, Leapfrogging development, Technology foresight | 1 Comment

Ingress: Google shows us how to do augmented reality.

Google has made available their new massive multiplayer augmented reality game Ingress. The game uses augmented reality technology to situate the game play in the real world. As Devin Coldewey at NBC News says, “‘Ingress’ has biggest map ever: The real world.” The game uses GPS and other smartphone technologies to generate portals at various locations in the real world, especially significant landmarks, public art or buildings. Two factions within the game, the “Enlightened” and the “Resistance” battle for control over these portals. The game’s website has some cryptic clues relating to the game. Current players have also set up a wiki for the game with more equally cryptic clues. Continue reading

Posted in Education, ICTs, Internet, Technology foresight, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Getting from foresight to policy: The critical role of organizations and social entities

I recently posted an article where I was looking to identify gaps in our knowledge about how foresight programs inform policy and decision-making. Since then, I’ve come across recent research which looks at these gaps in more detail. In particular, a recent paper published by Schartinger, Wilhelmer, Holste & Kubeczko, titled “Assessing immediate learning impacts of large foresight processes”, takes a systematic look at what happens at certain stages during and following the implementation of foresight programs. Despite some weaknesses in their paper, Schartinger et al. make very interesting points concerning the “intermediate” outcomes of foresight programs, i.e. the “knowledge gap” that I’ve pointed out previously, suggesting that we need to look more closely at organizational change in this regard (this is where I was moving before I came across this article so it’s partly that I’m happy to see more movement in this direction). In this article I want to address some of the weaknesses and then hone in on how we address the knowledge gap about intermediate outcomes of foresight programs. Continue reading

Posted in Education, ICTs, Information Society, Knowledge development, Leapfrogging development, Technology foresight, Uncategorized | 1 Comment